عقلانیت تکاملی و توسعه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

2 استادیار دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

چکیده

بیشتر اختلاف نظرها در حوزه های اقتصادی اجتماعی ناشی از درک نادرست از موضوع "عقلانیت" است‌  در این مقاله دو تبیین متفاوت از عقلانیت  ارائه می شود و توضیح داده می شود که " عقلانیت تکاملی" با توسعه سازگار است در حالی که ‌" عقلانیت ساخت گرا"  توجه را از نظم خودانگیخته بازار به مهندسی اقتصادی-اجتماعی معطوف کرده و از این طریق موجب انحراف ‌توسعه از مسیر تکاملی آن می‌‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evolutionary Rationality and Development

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammadgholi Yousefi 1
  • Amrollah Amini 2
1 Professor of Allameh Tabataba'i University
2 Assistant Professor of of Allameh Tabataba'i University
چکیده [English]

Most differences in socio-economic opinions stem from misunderstanding the concept of “rationality. 
In this paper we present two different interpretation of rationality. We explain that “Evolutionary Rationality” is more conductive to development while “constructivist Rationality” divert attention from a free spontaneous market to socio economic engineering, thereby diverting development from its evolutionary path

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Evolutionary Rationality
  • Constructivist Rationality
  • Institutions and Development

مراجع

  • زدلاچک، توماش. (1396). اقتصاد خیر و شر. ترجمه احد علیقلیان. تهران: فرهنگ نشر نو با همکاری نشر آسیم.
  • یوسفی، محمد قلی. (1396). خطاهای فکری علم اقتصاد، انتشارات دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی (ره).
  • یوسفی محمدقلی(1399) تکامل و توسعه، تهران انتشارات کاتافراکت .
  • Arnold, R. A. (1980). Hayek and institutional evolution. The journal of libertarian studies, 4(4), 341-352.
  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Cicero, M. T. (1974). De Re Publica, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Loeb Classical Library.
  • Ferguson, C. E., & Kreps, T.M. (1962). Principles of economics. New York.
  • Hayek, F. A. (2006). The constitution of liberty, London, Routledge.
  • Hayek F. A. (1978). Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hayek, F. A. (1975). The present state of the debate. Collectivist economic planning, 201-243.
  • Hayek, F. A. (1958). Freedom, reason, and tradition. Ethics, 68(4), 229-245.
  • Hayek, F. A. (1998). Law, legislation and liberty. Volume 1, Rules and Order, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Hayek, F. A. (1978). The three sources of human values. L.T. Hobhouse Memoral Trust Literature 44, London Schoolof Economics and Political Science.
  • Hayek, F. A. (1992). The fatal conceit: the errors of Socialism. Edited by W.W. Bartley, London: Routledge.
  • Hume, D. (1748). An enquiry concerning the principle of morals. London: J.B. Bebbington Book Sellers Row, Strand, W.C.P.
  • Hume, D. (1985). A treatise of human nature. London: Penguin Books.
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory. Econometrica, 47, 263-292.
  • Kaufman, B. E. (2007). The institutional economics of John R. Commons: complement and substitute for neoclassical economic theory. Socio-Economic Review, 5(1), 3-45.
  • Mandeville, B. (1924). The fable of the bees. Clarendon Press.
  • Mises, L. V. (2010). Human action: a treatise on economics. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
  • Nelson, R. H. (2001). Economics as religion: From Samuelson to Chicago and beyond. Penn State Press.
  • Papandreou, J. (1970) Basic problems in the theory of firms, Survey of Contemporary Economics.
  • Popper, K. R. (1958). The open society and its enemies. Princeton University Press.
  • Pugh, G. E. (1977). The biological origin of human values. New York: Basic Books.
  • Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2004). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
  • Samuelson P. A. & Nordhaus, W. D. (1985). 12th. ed, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1964). Business cycles: New York: Press McGraw-Hill.
  • Schweber, S. S. (1985). The wider British context in Darwin theorizingin: Kohn. E(ed) The Darwinian heritage: 35-69, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99-118.
  • Smith, A. (1981). An inquiry into the nature and causes of wealth of nations. Library Press: Indianapolis.
  • Smith, V. L. (2002a). Bargaining and market behavior. Cambridge University Press.
  • Smith, V. L. (2002b).  Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics. Prize Lecture, December 8, www.nobelproze.org.
  • Sugden, R. (1991). Rational choice: a survey of contributions from economics and philosophy. The Economic Journal, 101(407), 751-785.
  • Talmon, J. L. (1952). The origins of totalitarian democracy. London.
  • Thaler, R. (2015). Misbehaving: the making of behavioral economics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Thomsen, E. (1992). Prices and knowledge: a market-process perspective. New York: Rutledge.
  • Walras, L. (1874). Elements of pure economics. Homewood Irwin (English translation), Latest edition by Kelly Watson, New York.
  • Zwick, R., Erev, I., & Budescu, D. (1999). The psychological and economical perspectives on human decisions in social and interactive contexts. In David V. Bodescu, Ido Erev and Zwick, Rami (eds) Games and Human Behaviour: Essays in Honor of Amnon Rapoport. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawerence Earlbaum Associates.
تحلیل های اقتصادی توسعه ایران
دوره 8، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 21
فروردین 1401
صفحه 257-278

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار